Posting this late, but these last two chapters had me marking all kinds of things!

Let me just begin by saying that Vinton shares such fascinating reflections about what readers are really doing. I really appreciate being able to see into her mind.

I'm intrigued by a new idea - Framing vs. Scaffolding. "Thinking Frames" are from Project Zero's David Perkins Vinton writes. They help "guide the process of thought, supporting, organizing, and catalyzing". I have never learned about them before like I had with scaffolding. It is interesting that I am seeing over and over again this summer about how we have over-scaffolded students, so that the scaffold is the thing being taught, not the way of reading or thinking (p. 182). 

Framing "breaks down complex thinking into manageable pieces without ever losing sight of the whole" and "invites students to engage in the actual thinking work that's behind what we often teach as skills" (p. 182). 

I really am interested in this idea - getting at the thinking, rather than the end product. Isn't that what we purport to want from our students? But if we never give them the opportunity to actually think, what then?

I also am reading a great deal about "extraction" versus "transaction". I think many times we are asking students to extract - which again indicates a correct answer or end product. There are many types of questions that when framed just a bit differently, can bring the reader in and make them more inquisitive. 

What's the main idea? (extraction) versus What do you think the writer wants you to understand? (transaction) - What a difference!

On page 186 Vinton talks about "reacting to the facts, rather than responding". Reacting invites students to bring their feelings. I was excited about this because for a few years now, I've been using a chart called Fact/React with my library students which helps them annotate and think about the nonfiction they are reading. I found it on Twitter (I wish I could find the tweet!) but it has been really interesting to watch kids. Rather than just writing down facts, it asks them to show their thinking. To me, it helps take away that regurgitation of information.

​Chapter 10 discusses Independent Reading and conferences. I loved the slight shift Vinton suggests for beginning a conference - instead of asking about the book, make it about the reader. For example, Are you wondering about anything? or Have you noticed any patterns or things that are repeated? It's not about what they are reading, but how they are making meaning, which is really what we are teaching isn't it?

I also loved the quote on p. 208 about engagement from Charlotte Danielson - Here's the beginning: "Student engagement is not the same as  . . . "time on task." 

This work is hard. Really hard. And I have a lot to learn, but I am excited and energized to use these ideas with my students. I will have to make tweaks to use them in the library, but I love that challenge!

Thanks to all the #cyberPD folks for another amazing book group this summer!

I could write so much about these chapters - I'm literally filling a notebook with all my thoughts and ideas and stars and exclamation points. Here goes:

Chapter 7

Patterns - very much reminded me of what Beers & Probst write about in Notice & Note with their sign-posts. Vinton writes about how "writers convey meaning through patterns that change and break". That's how you can find spots to think and perhaps revise or add to previous thinking. I love how reading is like a process - I find that often. I reread certain books over and over and each time find something new that I haven't noticed before. She speaks about the END being the final time to revise and how it might show us what the writer intended.

Patterns are also found in many other areas, such as math and science, reminding me again how important it is for students to learn how to learn. So much can be applied to many different areas. Patterns are universal.

Going along with this, I loved how she connected reading and math through the idea of Rich tasks (p. 127). 

These are so important especially because they provide multiple paths for students to work. There is not one way of thinking!

In this chapter, Vinton also makes me think more about the language we use - maybe, could and might are all very vague - so that students must continue to think rather than just wait for confirmation by the teacher.

​

Chapter 8

On to nonfiction!!! I was so excited to see this coming up because of what we do in the library with inquiry and evaluation of information.

I appreciated so much the focus on expository nonfiction - that is a genre that is difficult to work with and sometime I feel like I am only taking the text at face value. I loved how Vinton provides a way for us to be thinking about the facts "how they are related, what they might imply and how a phenomenon, process, or event works or happens" (p. 139).

There is a shift from just knowing to UNDERSTANDING. 

Loved this: "aboutitis" from David Perkins (see p. 141 & 2) - this seems like just the knowing part, without the understanding. 

P. 144 - The goal is understanding, not just collecting facts! I'm really going to be thinking about this and how to share this with teachers.

P. 155 Vinton does some comparing of CCSS purpose with a Problem-based process. In her opinion, CCSS is very product, answer getting, comprehension question focused as opposed to process, thinking and explaining, and understanding focused. I'm interested to see what other folks think about this.

Toward the end of the chapter, time is spent in thinking about the teacher as a learner in the class too. It is again a move away from "I know everything" to "we are in this together and we all get confused" types of mentalities. 

Lastly, the takeaway about how confusion is actually really important. I have read/heard about how learning happens when 2 things almost rub against one another and so you really have to think. It can be painful sometimes, but far more rewarding in the end!

Continued to be fascinated by the ideas in this book!

Here is the post for week 2 - I posted directly to the group because I was away at the HOT Schools Summer Institute for some amazing STEAM learning!

There were so many things to think about as I read this first section of Dynamic Thinking for Deeper Reading! I am also reading Disrupting Thinking (Beers & Probst) at the same time for the slow twitter chat #readDTchat, so my mind is really exploding! I am a PreK - 4 library media specialist in central Connecticut and I am passionate about providing the best reading experiences for my students and supporting the teachers in my schools too. I am going to focus on a few of the ideas that surprised me or made me wonder and that I felt are important, especially in the library.

1) Over-scaffolding - are we getting to the point where this is happening and where teachers are doing much more work than the kids?
2) I was intrigued by the idea that there is too much "skillification" going on. I think that like everything else, there must be a balance. My district began using the Calkins units of study for reading last year and I am curious to find out what the teachers think about that balance. 
3) Problem-based approach to reading - interesting to think about that it is the move from extracting to transacting (from both this book & Disrupting Thinking)

4) As a librarian, I thrive on readers bringing themselves to texts - I find it impossible to separate myself. It seems like that would be telling readers that their experience simply doesn't matter. Not a great way to grow readers.
5) Do we get lost in the teaching of the skill or strategy and forget that the goal is really to understand the text?
6) Again - high degrees of scaffolding means that students aren't thinking. 

7) I love the importance of the change or revision as new information is encountered. I think this is an area that I can really focus on in the library through inquiry. Very excited to explore this in the coming school year.

8) There's been a lot of talk about creativity - thinking about applying it to reading was new to me. Seems almost opposite of what they Common Core is focusing on, but I'll have to learn a little more about this.
9) Surprised by the notion that text dependent means teacher dependent. 
10) Loved the thoughts about critical thinking and creativity - they very much follow the Guided Inquiry Design model and what I am learning about in terms of science with the NGSS. Very similar processes - universals.
11) Loved the flip of the words - close reading vs. reading closely. This seems like a very subtle shift, but I think it is huge.
12) The process of reading being circular - see #10.

13) Brain research - so fascinating. I see this with my own kids - if they are bored or frustrated with something, the stress and anxiety come to the surface and it makes it difficult to learn. 
14) DEEP!!! - I really thought about deeper learning in terms of my library classes. It is so difficult to see students 45 min. per week (if I'm lucky) and to really have deep learning. What can I do to improve the learning for my students?
15) Ahhh - choice! As a librarian, choice is imperative. This spring my students and I participated in the #readingwithoutwalls challenge from author Gene Luen Yang, our National Ambassador for Young People's Literature this year. Even within this challenge there is choice. While I understand the need for all students to work with the same text at times, it seems to me that shorter pieces can be used and then move on to where students have choice.
16) Dylan Wiliam's work has been very influential on me and I was glad to see him referenced in chapter 4. I love the idea of impactful feedback that occurs just in time, not at the end of something. By then, it is almost meaningless, especially because usually, that feedback won't be used in any way. It's just there.
17) Teacher as learner! That's what we each are doing and I do show my students the learning I do over the summer. Vinton writes about how important it is to model how to BE, not just how to do. Give up that control!

Throughout these chapters, the peek into classrooms and conferences with students has been a great way to ground the learning we are doing. I especially loved the mud in the tea example - you just never know what they will be thinking!

I am so excited to be reading these titles this summer and to be attending the 24th Annual HOT School Summer Institute: The HOT Approach Makes STEM Sizzle! Book group #1 is a slow twitter chat about the book Disrupting Thinking by Beers & Probst, using the hashtag #ReadDTchat. Questions are posted each week as we read and explore this book. Dynamic Teaching for Deeper Reading by Vicki Vinton is the professional book chat hosted by #cyberPD, a Google + community. Each week we will read, post and then comment on one another's posts. This is my 3rd year participating and the learning and community is awesome! Read the next post for my response to the introduction and chapters 1-4.

Do you see it up in the corner? That's it - Cubetto. My students are in love. 

I have been using Cubetto from Primo with my kindergarten classes this spring. It has been so much fun and every adult who is in the room with me is astounded. There are so many things I love about this robot. 

• It's screen free!
• It involves story!
• We can get hands on!
• Many different topics are embedded!
• Oh, and then there's the whole computational thinking/coding thing.

I purchased the Cubetto + Adventure Pack. Here's what you get: Cubetto, Board, 16 blocks, 5 World maps made of cloth & 5 story books. 

We got started simply by bringing half a class down on the floor where I had Cubetto ready to go. (You do need AA batteries!) The kids were so excited! Everyone got to touch the robot and pat it on the head. Then we started to try out the different blocks. We loved that the green block moved it forward and the red block turned it right because they were easy to remember. Yellow turns left and the blue (function block) was a mystery for a while. Next, we noticed the compass rose and talked about the directions on the map. Cubetto starts on the compass rose. Then we started reading the story and away we went. I made sure each child got to add blocks and push the blue button to execute the program. 

Here's one more action shot:

Even my 10 year old was fascinated by Cubetto!

Cubetto gets kids to think about what must happen to accomplish different goals - that idea of computational thinking.There is all kinds of great language building happening too! It's coding without the screen. It's creative, play, and fun! 

There are many resources available for Cubetto and I'm excited to have my students try some new things, such as building their own course to maneuver Cubetto through. I think there are endless possibilities with Cubetto!

Besides the amazing opportunity to "see" the ALA Youth Media Awards streaming live on Monday morning, I was particularly excited to learn something important too. Sibert is pronounced with a long i sound - not an e sound as I had been doing for the past two weeks.

And what a way to start off Monday! Of course I was thrilled to hear the winners of the Newbery, Caldecott and Geisel Medals announced, but perhaps even more special was to hear about some of the awards with which I was less familiar. Congratulations to all the amazing authors and illustrators for their important work.

Because we were attempting to finish our Mock Caldecott reading, as well as learn about some possible nominees for the Sibert Award, my students did not get to spend as much time interacting with the texts as some of the other smackdown participants did. But all six of my library classes that had third or fourth graders were able to look at and read most of each of the books I was able to find. Click here for my post about the awards and books on which we focused.
​

My students chose Whoosh! Lonnie Johnson's Super-soaking Stream of Inventions by Chris Barton and illustrated by Don Tate. Not too far behind were Animals by the Numbers, Coyote Moon, and Giant Squid. 

We had a lot of fun sharing thoughts with students from around the U.S. and the world, using Flipgrid and Padlet. Check out Michele Knott's post about her students' ideas about these books. Listen to students from Erika Victor's class in Malaysia on the Flipgrid too!

The students overwhelming selected Are We There Yet? by Dan Santat. I think it was the dinosaurs that hooked them!

We are ready! My library classes have been reading and thinking critically about many different pictures books and this week, we join some very special committees as we select our own winners. It is not going to be easy. Have you read these books yet? Many of us are agonizing over the decision. And this is just for the few books we read together. We cannot even imagine what each committee has gone through! Monday, January 23, the ALA Youth Media awards will be announced. Woo hoo!

Mr. Schu has a terrific list of Mock Caldecott titles so that is what we used. Take a look!

There's still time to share student voices! Read Melissa Stewart's blog post to get title ideas. Then check out our #sibertsmackdown page and the Flipgrid (on the Flipgrid app use code: 30fa9c) on which your students can record which Mock Sibert title they chose and why. We can't wait to hear what you think!